Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Posted by David Guilbault on September 09, 2009 at 07:22 PM in On Government, On Health, On Truth | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by David Guilbault on September 05, 2009 at 06:05 PM in On Government, On Greed, On Health, On Money | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Congressional Republicans and health insurance lobbyists are lying to the American people - knowingly and cynically - to protect their greedy entrenched interests by killing health care reform. That's the truth, pure and simple.
"The recent attacks by Republican leaders and their ideological fellow-travelers on the effort to reform the health-care system have been so misleading, so disingenuous, that they could only spring from a cynical effort to gain partisan political advantage. By poisoning the political well, they've given up any pretense of being the loyal opposition. They've become political terrorists, willing to say or do anything to prevent the country from reaching a consensus on one of its most serious domestic problems."
Posted by David Guilbault on August 06, 2009 at 10:01 PM in On Government, On Greed, On Health, On Money, On Truth | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I have not had much faith in the political leadership of House leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate leader Harry Reid in the health care reform debate. Today, Pelosi, finally got some guts and laid the blame for our broken, greedy system at the feet of the real obstructionists of reform - the health insurance industry. Some of her comments today:
Pelosi: Health Insurance Companies the Real Villains
"They are the villains in this. They have been part of the problem in a major way," Pelosi said of the insurance industry after her weekly press conference. "It's almost immoral, what they are doing," she said, referring to industry lobbying against a public insurance plan option. "Of course, they've been immoral all along. They are doing everything in their power to stop a public option from happening, and the public has to know about it."
The current system works so well for insurers that they don't even want subsidies, Pelosi claimed. "They've had a good thing going for a long time at the expense of the American people and the health of our country," she said, adding that it will be tough to keep them from getting their way. "This is the fight of our lives."
- Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House
Posted by David Guilbault on July 30, 2009 at 02:13 PM in On Government, On Health, On Politics, On Truth | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Today, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano gave an honest assessment of the current threat of terrorism in a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations. It is worth a read.
Homeland Chief Offers Shift in Tone
"Homeland Security Secretary Janet A. Napolitano on Wednesday called for closer collaboration with foreign partners, more intensive cooperation with local law-enforcement officials, and greater involvement by citizens in watching for and responding to terrorist threats.
For too long, we’ve treated the public as a liability to be protected rather than as an asset in our nation’s collective security,” Ms. Napolitano said during a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. “This approach, unfortunately, has allowed confusion, anxiety and fear to linger.”
“The consequences of living in a state of fear rather than a state of preparedness are enormous,” she said. ...
“The terror threat is even more decentralized, networked and adaptive than on 9/11,” she said. “The United States needed an approach that was “more layered, networked and resilient.”
In her speech, Ms. Napolitano seemed intent on a shift of tone, a recasting of the way Americans view the terror threat. Implicitly, she seemed to rebuke the approach taken by the Bush administration, which critics said too often seemed to exaggerate threats and sow a sense of fear.
- Brain Knowlton, The New York Times
PHOTO: Chris Hondros/Getty Images
Posted by David Guilbault on July 29, 2009 at 03:38 PM in On Government, On Violence, On War | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Posted by David Guilbault on July 26, 2009 at 06:55 PM in On Government, On Stupidity | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
"What matters about Cronkite is that he knew when to stop being reassuring Uncle Walter and to challenge those who betrayed his audience’s trust. He had the guts to confront not only those in power but his own bosses. Given the American press’s catastrophe of our own day — its failure to unmask and often even to question the White House propaganda campaign that plunged us into Iraq — these attributes are as timely as ever.
That’s why the past week’s debate about whether there could ever again be a father-figure anchor with Cronkite’s everyman looks and sonorous delivery is an escapist parlor game. What matters is content, not style. The real question is this: How many of those with similarly exalted perches in the news media today — and those perches, however diminished, still do exist in the multichannel digital age — will speak truth to power when the country is on the line? This journalistic responsibility cannot be outsourced to Comedy Central and Jon Stewart. ...
Watching many of the empty Cronkite tributes in his own medium over the past week, you had to wonder if his industry was sticking to mawkish clichés just to avoid unflattering comparisons. If he was the most trusted man in America, it wasn’t because he was a nice guy with an authoritative voice and a lived-in face. It wasn’t because he “loved a good story” or that he removed his glasses when a president died. It was because at a time of epic corruption in the most powerful precincts in Washington, Cronkite was not at the salons and not in the tank."
- Frank Rich, The New York Times
Posted by David Guilbault on July 25, 2009 at 07:00 PM in On Government, On Journalism, On Television, On Truth | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The secretive dirty deeds of the Cheney-Bush administration need to be investigated. Let's see if the mainstream media spend anywhere near the time and resources on this story as they have on investigating the death, familial dramas and peculiarities of Michael Jackson.
Posted by David Guilbault on July 12, 2009 at 07:35 PM in On Government, On Truth, On War | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Sarah Palin steps down. Here's her speech - Huh? It's a rambling, incoherent, clearly insincere performance. And, she's clearly lying through her gleaming white teeth. Something's up. Every time I hear this buffoon speak, I think the same thing, "Oh ... my ... God."
"We're fishermen. We know only dead fish go with the flow."
- Gov. Sarah Palin
SARAH'S STRAIGHT TALK
"Truly, Sarah Palin has come a long way. When she ran for vice president, she frequently became disjointed and garbled when she departed from her prepared remarks. Now the prepared remarks are incoherent, too.“And a problem in our country today is apathy,” she said on Friday as she announced that she would resign as governor of Alaska at the end of the month. “It would be apathetic to just hunker down and ‘go with the flow.’ Nah, only dead fish ‘go with the flow.’ No. Productive, fulfilled people determine where to put their efforts, choosing to wisely utilize precious time ... to BUILD UP.”
Basically, the point was that Palin is quitting as governor because she’s not a quitter. Or a deceased salmon.
Sarah Barracuda made her big announcement Friday afternoon on the lawn of her home to an audience that appeared to include only Todd, the kids and the next-door neighbors. Smiling manically, she looked like a parody of the woman who knocked the Republicans dead at their convention. She babbled about her parents’ refrigerator magnet, which apparently had a lot of wise advice. And she recalled her visit with the troops in Kosovo, whose dedication and determination inspired her to ... resign."
- Gail Collins, The New York Times
PALIN AND HER ENEMIES
"If Palin were exactly what her critics believe she is — the distillation of every right-wing pathology, from anti-intellectualism to apocalyptic Christianity — then she wouldn’t be a terribly interesting figure. But this caricature has always missed the point of the Alaska governor’s appeal — one that extends well outside the Republican Party’s shrinking base.
In a recent Pew poll, 44 percent of Americans regarded Palin unfavorably. But slightly more had a favorable impression of her. That number included 46 percent of independents, and 48 percent of Americans without a college education.
That last statistic is a crucial one. Palin’s popularity has as much to do with class as it does with ideology. In this sense, she really is the perfect foil for Barack Obama. Our president represents the meritocratic ideal — that anyone, from any background, can grow up to attend Columbia and Harvard Law School and become a great American success story. But Sarah Palin represents the democratic ideal — that anyone can grow up to be a great success story without graduating from Columbia and Harvard"
- Ross Douthat, The New York Times
Posted by David Guilbault on July 03, 2009 at 04:54 PM in On Government, On Media, On Stupidity, On Truth | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The chief disinformation operative of the Republican party is leading a propaganda campaign against national health care reform. He is Frank Luntz.
He has crafted a 28-page talking points memo for Conservatives, called "The Language of Health Care 2009," to trumpet the dishonest accusation of a "Washington takeover of healthcare." It is cynical, distorted, fear mongering self-interest at its worst.
Luntz advises opponents of universal health care to make the debate about "politicians," "bureaucrats," and "Washington," and to highlight "horror stories" about "government takeover." He tells them to play on the fear the public has of "denied treatment."
Luntz writes, "The best approach is to empathize with the fear, anxiety and financial pain people are clearly feeling right now. So instead of dismissing their concerns, acknowledge them – up front – and then pivot to your solution. Some conservatives will undoubtedly find this distasteful. But failure to connect on a personal level at the beginning will lead to communication failure at the end."
Later he writes, "It is essential that “deny” and “denial” enter the conservative lexicon immediately because it is at the core of what scares Americans most about a government takeover of healthcare. Then add to it the source of that denial and you have the perfect anti-government, anti-Washington and anti-Democratic message."
So, you will hear this mantra repeated from Republican after Republican:
“No Washington bureaucrat or healthcare lobbyist should stand between your family and your doctor. The Democrats want to put Washington politicians in charge of YOUR healthcare. We can and must do better. Say no to a Washington takeover of healthcare and say yes to personalized patient-centered care.”
Of course, "personalized patient-centered care" is code for health insurance company control. That is the powerful industry Luntz and his cohorts are trying to protect.
Luntz and his associates are the premier manipulators of language for selfish, partisan ends.
Read one of his mission statements from their web site (emphasis is mine):
Luntz, Maslansky Strategic Research
"Our focus is on language. We believe that every word you use matters. Luntz, Maslansky is known across the nation for how we reframe issues. From changing the “estate tax” to the “death tax,” “tax cuts” to “tax relief,” “global warming” to “climate change” – time after time we have succeeded in changing the course of the debate. By focusing on how to communicate your message, Luntz, Maslansky helps you reframe the issue using your side’s words and messages. Our unique research methodology allows us to precisely gauge public opinion and develop the most effective approach and language to take control of the issue. We know how to change hearts and minds and motivate people to act."
from Luntz, Maslansky Strategic Research website

Their goal is to help "virtually every major industry" to distort their message and mask their true agenda. Another quote from their web site:
"In the political arena, our CEO, Dr. Frank Luntz, is known for helping change the public vocabulary – he transformed the "estate tax" into the "the death tax," moved the public debate from "school vouchers" to "opportunity scholarships," and re-cast "drilling for oil" as "exploring for energy." ... In the corporate arena, Luntz, Maslansky currently works for clients in virtually every major industry: pharmaceuticals, telecommunications, energy, health care, transportation, sports, entertainment, travel and tourism, shopping centers, grocery stores, restaurants, food, and beverages."
If Frank Luntz is involved in a public campaign, you may assume the goal is to "pull the wool over your eyes."
And, so then, is his mission in the health care debate.
Photo Credit: Frederick M. Brown / Getty Images
Posted by David Guilbault on June 11, 2009 at 07:15 PM in On Government, On Greed, On Health, On Politics, On Truth | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
PHOTO CREDIT: Official White House photo by Pete Souza"From Europe to the Pacific, we've been the nation that has shut down torture chambers and replaced tyranny with the rule of law. That is who we are. And where terrorists offer only the injustice of disorder and destruction, America must demonstrate that our values and our institutions are more resilient than a hateful ideology. ...
Now this generation faces a great test in the specter of terrorism. And unlike the Civil War or World War II, we can't count on a surrender ceremony to bring this journey to an end. Right now, in distant training camps and in crowded cities, there are people plotting to take American lives. That will be the case a year from now, five years from now, and -- in all probability -- 10 years from now. Neither I nor anyone can stand here today and say that there will not be another terrorist attack that takes American lives.
But I can say with certainty that my administration -- along with our extraordinary troops and the patriotic men and women who defend our national security -- will do everything in our power to keep the American people safe. And I do know with certainty that we can defeat al Qaeda. Because the terrorists can only succeed if they swell their ranks and alienate America from our allies, and they will never be able to do that if we stay true to who we are, if we forge tough and durable approaches to fighting terrorism that are anchored in our timeless ideals. This must be our common purpose."
- President Barack Obama
Posted by David Guilbault on May 21, 2009 at 07:04 PM in On Government, On War | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Thomas Friedman, writing in The New York Times, warns about getting "stuck in the middle' with Afghanistan, Iran and North Korea.
The only thing that could change this is a greater exercise of U.S. and allied power. In the case of Afghanistan and Pakistan, that power would have to be used to actually rebuild these states from the inside into modern nations. We would literally have to build the institutions — the pulleys and wheels — so that when the leaders of these states pulled a lever something actually happened, and the lever wouldn’t just break off in their hands.
And in the case of the strong states — Iran and North Korea — we would have to generate much more effective leverage from the outside to get them to change their behavior along the lines we seek. In both cases, though, success surely would require a bigger and longer U.S. investment of money and power, not to mention allies.
Instead, I fear that we are adopting a middle-ground strategy — doing just enough to avoid collapse but not enough to solve the problems. If our goal in Afghanistan and Pakistan is nation-building, so they will have self-sustaining moderate governments, we surely don’t have enough troops or resources inside devoted to either. If our goal is changing regime behavior in Iran and North Korea, we surely have not generated enough leverage from outside. North Korea’s defiant missile launch and Iran’s continued development of its nuclear capability testify to that.
Posted by David Guilbault on April 15, 2009 at 11:26 AM in On Government, On War | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by David Guilbault on February 25, 2009 at 12:36 AM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Dear Mr. President. Please stop wondering and worrying about bipartisan support for your plan to stimulate the economy. Be brave. Be bold. And please be beholding to the electorate who voted for 'change'. The Republicans' economic ideas are tired and wrong. Stop listening to them. Do what needs to be done. Spend what needs to be spent.
Transcript: Obama's first prime-time news conference
GOP Sees Positives in Negative Stand
"Three months after their Election Day drubbing, Republican leaders see glimmers of rebirth in the party's liberation from an unpopular president, its selection of its first African American chairman and, most of all, its stand against a stimulus package that they are increasingly confident will provide little economic jolt but will pay off politically for those who oppose it."
- Alec MacGillis and Perry Bacon, Jr., The Washington Post
"Initially, Obama hoped to win broad Republican support for his stimulus package, but most Republicans preferred to bloody up this new, young president. Obama adjusted.
If the GOP wanted a fight, he would not back down. Obama's tougher rhetoric and terrible new economic news helped push a handful of wavering senators to agree to a compromise stimulus bill on Friday.
Still, there was a cost to Obama's delayed response to Republican provocations. By giving conservatives a week to savage the House-passed stimulus, Obama weakened his negotiating hand."
- E. J. Dionne, Jr., The Washington Post
"I blame President Obama’s belief that he can transcend the partisan divide — a belief that warped his economic strategy.
After all, many people expected Mr. Obama to come out with a really strong stimulus plan, reflecting both the economy’s dire straits and his own electoral mandate.
Instead, however, he offered a plan that was clearly both too small and too heavily reliant on tax cuts. Why? Because he wanted the plan to have broad bipartisan support, and believed that it would. Not long ago administration strategists were talking about getting 80 or more votes in the Senate.
Mr. Obama’s postpartisan yearnings may also explain why he didn’t do something crucially important: speak forcefully about how government spending can help support the economy. Instead, he let conservatives define the debate, waiting until late last week before finally saying what needed to be said — that increasing spending is the whole point of the plan."
- Paul Krugman, The New York Times
Photo: Ruth Fremson/The New York Times
Posted by David Guilbault on February 09, 2009 at 01:27 PM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Remarks by President Barack Obama on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan:
"As we are meeting, in the halls of Congress just down the street from here, there's a debate going on about the plan I've proposed, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan.
This isn't some abstract debate. Last week, we learned that many of America's largest corporations are planning to lay off tens of thousands of workers.
Today we learned that last week, the number of new unemployment claims jumped to 626,000. Tomorrow, we're expecting another dismal jobs report on top of the 2.6 million jobs that we lost last year. We've lost half a million jobs each month for the last two months.
Now, I believe that legislation of such magnitude as has been proposed deserves the scrutiny that it has received over the last month. I think that's a good thing. That's the way democracy is supposed to work. But these numbers that we're seeing are sending an unmistakable message -- and so are the American people. The time for talk is over. The time for action is now, because we know that if we do not act, a bad situation will become dramatically worse. Crisis could turn into catastrophe for families and businesses across the country.
And I refuse to let that happen. We can't delay and we can't go back to the same worn-out ideas that led us here in the first place. In the last few days, we've seen proposals arise from some in Congress that you may not have read but you'd be very familiar with because you've been hearing them for the last 10 years, maybe longer. They're rooted in the idea that tax cuts alone can solve all our problems; that government doesn't have a role to play; that half-measures and tinkering are somehow enough; that we can afford to ignore our most fundamental economic challenges -- the crushing cost of health care, the inadequate state of so many of our schools, our dangerous dependence on foreign oil.
So let me be clear: Those ideas have been tested, and they have failed. They've taken us from surpluses to an annual deficit of over a trillion dollars, and they've brought our economy to a halt. And that's precisely what the election we just had was all about. The American people have rendered their judgment. And now is the time to move forward, not back. Now is the time for action.
Just as past generations of Americans have done in trying times, we can and we must turn this moment of challenge into one of opportunity. The plan I've proposed has at its core a simple idea: Let's put Americans to work doing the work that America needs to be done.
This plan will save or create over 3 million jobs -- almost all of them in the private sector. This plan will put people to work rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, our dangerous -- dangerously deficient dams and levees.
This plan will put people to work modernizing our health care system, not only saving us billions of dollars, but countless lives.
This plan will put people to work renovating more than 10,000 schools, giving millions of children the chance to learn in 21st century classrooms, libraries and labs -- and to all the scientists in the room today, you know what that means for America's future.
This plan will provide sensible tax relief for the struggling middle class, unemployment insurance and continuing health care coverage for those who've lost their jobs, and it will help prevent our states and local communities from laying off firefighters and teachers and police.
And finally, this plan will begin to end the tyranny of oil in our time.
After decades of dragging our feet, this plan will finally spark the creation of a clean energy industry that will create hundreds of thousands of jobs over the next few years, manufacturing wind turbines and solar cells, for example -- millions more after that. These jobs and these investments will double our capacity to generate renewable energy over the next few years.
We'll fund a better, smarter electricity grid and train workers to build it -- a grid that will help us ship wind and solar power from one end of this country to another. Think about it. The grid that powers the tools of modern life -- computers, appliances, even BlackBerrys -- (laughter) -- looks largely the same as it did half a century ago. Just these first steps towards modernizing the way we distribute electricity could reduce consumption by 2 to 4 percent.
We'll also lead a revolution in energy efficiency, modernizing more than 75 percent of federal buildings and improving the efficiency of more than 2 million American homes. This will not only create jobs, it will cut the federal energy bill by a third and save taxpayers $2 billion each year and save Americans billions of dollars more on their utility bills.
In fact, as part of this effort, today I've signed a presidential memorandum requesting that the Department of Energy set new efficiency standards for common household appliances. This will save consumers money, this will spur innovation, and this will conserve tremendous amounts of energy. We'll save through these simple steps over the next 30 years the amount of energy produced over a two-year period by all the coal-fired power plants in America.
And through investments in our mass transit system to boost capacity, in our roads to reduce congestion, and in technologies that will accelerate the development of innovations like plug-in hybrid vehicles, we'll be making a significant down payment on a cleaner and more energy independent future.
Now, I read the other day that critics of this plan ridiculed our notion that we should use part of the money to modernize the entire fleet of federal vehicles to take advantage of state of the art fuel efficiency. This is what they call pork. You know the truth. It will not only save the government significant money over time, it will not only create manufacturing jobs for folks who are making these cars, it will set a standard for private industry to match. And so when you hear these attacks deriding something of such obvious importance as this, you have to ask yourself -- are these folks serious? Is it any wonder that we haven't had a real energy policy in this country?
For the last few years, I've talked about these issues with Americans from one end of this country to another. And Washington may not be ready to get serious about energy independence, but I am. And so are you. And so are the American people. Inaction is not an option that is acceptable to me and it's certainly not acceptable to the American people -- not on energy, not on the economy, not at this critical moment.
So I am calling on all the members of Congress -- Democrats and Republicans, House and Senate -- to rise to this moment. No plan is perfect. There have been constructive changes made to this one over the last several weeks. I would love to see additional improvements today. But the scale and the scope of this plan is the right one. Our approach to energy is the right one. It's what America needs right now, and we need to move forward today. We can't keep on having the same old arguments over and over again that lead us to the exact same spot -- where we are wasting previous energy, we're not creating jobs, we're failing to compete in the global economy, and we end up bickering at a time when the economy urgently needs action.
I thank all of you for being here, and I'm eager to work with Secretary Chu and all of you as we stand up to meet the challenges of this new century. That's what the American people are looking for. That's what I expect out of Congress. That's what I believe we can deliver to our children and our grandchildren in their future. Thank you so much, everybody. I appreciate it. Thank you."
- Barack Obama, President, February 5
Posted by David Guilbault on February 05, 2009 at 06:27 PM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The New York Times, in its article "Obama Visits Capitol to Press Republicans on Stimulus Plan", quotes President Obama urging legislators to "put politics aside and do the American people's business right now."
"Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the House Republican leader, said after the meeting that significant philosophical differences remained between the president and the Republicans, but they also agreed on several fronts. The mere fact of the meeting, he said, was an early sign of a willingness by the White House to solicit input from all sides. ...
But even before the president stepped into the meeting, Republican leaders in the House asked their members during a closed-door meeting on Tuesday to oppose the recovery plan unless significant adjustments are made before the bill comes up for a vote on Wednesday. ...
“The goal is to seek their input,” Robert Gibbs, a White House spokesman, said of the meetings with Republicans. “He wants to hear their ideas. If there are good ideas — and I think he assumes there will be — we will look at those ideas.”
- Jeff Zeleny, The New York Times
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
When Republicans are in control, in the White House and Congress, they ride roughshod over feckless Democrats. When the G.O.P. is not in power, they play a partisan game of obstructionism, and cry phony fouls.
As Bob Herbert writes today in his New York Times column, "The Same Old Song", "When the G.O.P. talks, nobody should listen."
"The question that I would like answered is why anyone listens to this crowd anymore. G.O.P. policies have been an absolute backbreaker for the middle class. (Forget the poor. Nobody talks about them anymore, not even the Democrats.) The G.O.P. has successfully engineered a wholesale redistribution of wealth to those already at the top of the income ladder and then, in a remarkable display of chutzpah, dared anyone to talk about class warfare. ...
When the G.O.P. talks, nobody should listen. Republicans have argued, with the collaboration of much of the media, that they could radically cut taxes while simultaneously balancing the federal budget, when, in fact, big income-tax cuts inevitably lead to big budget deficits. We listened to the G.O.P. and what do we have now? A trillion-dollar-plus deficit and an economy in shambles."
- Bob Herbert, The New York Times
Posted by David Guilbault on January 27, 2009 at 02:26 PM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
On his first day on the job, President Barack Obama shined the light of disclosure on government. He said "For a long time there's been too much secrecy in this city. Transparency and rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency... Starting today, every agency and department should know that this admistration stands on the side not of those who seek to withhold information, but those who seek to make it known."
Posted by David Guilbault on January 21, 2009 at 11:08 PM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Posted by David Guilbault on January 20, 2009 at 11:05 AM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by David Guilbault on January 19, 2009 at 10:42 PM in On Government, On Understanding | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Posted by David Guilbault on January 12, 2009 at 04:32 PM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Posted by David Guilbault on January 07, 2009 at 06:22 PM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
W. Mark Felt, Watergate Deep Throat, Dies at 95
By Tim Weiner, The New York Times"W. Mark Felt, who was the No. 2 official at the F.B.I. when he helped bring down President Richard M. Nixon by resisting the Watergate cover-up and becoming Deep Throat, the most famous anonymous source in American history, died Thursday. He was 95 and lived in Santa Rosa, Calif. ...
Mr. Felt played a dual role in the fall of Nixon. As a secret informant, he kept the story alive in the press. As associate director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, he fought the president’s efforts to obstruct the F.B.I.’s investigation of the Watergate break-in.
Without Mr. Felt, there might not have been a Watergate — shorthand for the revealed abuses of presidential powers in the Nixon White House, including illegal wiretapping, burglaries and money laundering. Americans might never have seen a president as a criminal conspirator, or reporters as cultural heroes, or anonymous sources like Mr. Felt as a necessary if undesired tool in the pursuit of truth."
Posted by David Guilbault on December 19, 2008 at 07:57 AM in On Government, On Media, On Truth | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I am just so happy and relieved that Barack Obama is going to be our next president. I can stop worrying so much about my children's future and the terrible, terrible course this country has been on under the dangerous, arrogant, belligerent buffoonery of Bush/Cheney/Rove/Wolfowitz/Rumsfeld/Kristal.
So, in this blog, I'm going to 'change my tune' a bit and spend some time on my first and true love - songwriting. Here are a tip of the hat to Johnny Cash:
Posted by David Guilbault on November 14, 2008 at 01:14 PM in On Government, On Music | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
President-elect Barack Obama's transition team has posted a new website, change.gov, which promises to be "your source for the latest news, events and announcement so that you can follow the setting up of the Obama administration."
Posted by David Guilbault on November 10, 2008 at 01:26 PM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
When President-elect Barack Obama takes office next year he will have the opportunity to immediately start to right the course of this country, which President Bush has steered so wrongly.
According to a news report on the Washington Post website, 'Obama Positioned to Quickly Reverse Bush Actions', transition advisers to Obama have compiled a list of about 200 Bush administration actions and executive orders which could be swiftly undone. They relate to Bush policies on such issues as climate change, stem cell research and reproductive rights.
But, The New York Times warns in an editorial, 'So Little Time, So Much Damage', that Bush aides have been "scrambling to change rules and regulations on the environment, civil liberties and abortion rights, among others - few for the good."
According to the Times:
Here's hoping the 44th President of the United Stages can repair the damage done by W. and his oily oilmen.
Posted by David Guilbault on November 08, 2008 at 08:50 PM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by David Guilbault on November 07, 2008 at 06:39 PM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Judith Warner writes a wonderful opinion piece called 'Tears to Remember' in today's New York Times.
"This moment of triumph marks the end of such a long period of pain, of indignity and injustice for African-Americans. And for so many others of us, of the trampling and debasing of our most basic ideals, beliefs that we cherished every bit as deeply and passionately as those of the “values voters” around whose sensibilities we’ve had to tiptoe for the past 28 years.
The election brought the return of a country we’d lost for so long that it was almost forgotten under the accumulated scar tissue of accommodation and acceptance.
For me, this will be the enduring memory of election night 2008: One generation released its grief. The next looked up confusedly, eager to please and yet unable to comprehend just what the tears were about."
- Judith Warner, The New York Times
Photo Credit: David Goldman / The New York Times
Posted by David Guilbault on November 07, 2008 at 03:00 PM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by David Guilbault on November 05, 2008 at 10:09 PM in On Government | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)



