Posted by David Guilbault on September 17, 2009 at 02:01 AM in On Health, On Journalism, On Race | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Posted by David Guilbault on September 09, 2009 at 07:22 PM in On Government, On Health, On Truth | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by David Guilbault on September 08, 2009 at 07:09 PM in On Compassion, On Culture, On Health, On Race | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by David Guilbault on September 05, 2009 at 06:05 PM in On Government, On Greed, On Health, On Money | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by David Guilbault on August 28, 2009 at 10:38 PM in On Health | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
In an editorial, The New York Times looks at who the medically uninsured are in this country, and concludes: "Any nation as rich as ours ought to guarantee health coverage for all of its residents."
"Scores of well-designed studies have shown that uninsured people are more likely than insured people to die prematurely, to have their cancers diagnosed too late, or to die from heart failure, a heart attack, a stroke or a severe injury. The Institute of Medicine estimated in 2004 that perhaps 18,000 deaths a year among adults could be attributed to lack of insurance."
- Editorial, The New York Times
Posted by David Guilbault on August 22, 2009 at 11:10 PM in On Health | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Congressional Republicans and health insurance lobbyists are lying to the American people - knowingly and cynically - to protect their greedy entrenched interests by killing health care reform. That's the truth, pure and simple.
"The recent attacks by Republican leaders and their ideological fellow-travelers on the effort to reform the health-care system have been so misleading, so disingenuous, that they could only spring from a cynical effort to gain partisan political advantage. By poisoning the political well, they've given up any pretense of being the loyal opposition. They've become political terrorists, willing to say or do anything to prevent the country from reaching a consensus on one of its most serious domestic problems."
Posted by David Guilbault on August 06, 2009 at 10:01 PM in On Government, On Greed, On Health, On Money, On Truth | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I have not had much faith in the political leadership of House leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate leader Harry Reid in the health care reform debate. Today, Pelosi, finally got some guts and laid the blame for our broken, greedy system at the feet of the real obstructionists of reform - the health insurance industry. Some of her comments today:
Pelosi: Health Insurance Companies the Real Villains
"They are the villains in this. They have been part of the problem in a major way," Pelosi said of the insurance industry after her weekly press conference. "It's almost immoral, what they are doing," she said, referring to industry lobbying against a public insurance plan option. "Of course, they've been immoral all along. They are doing everything in their power to stop a public option from happening, and the public has to know about it."
The current system works so well for insurers that they don't even want subsidies, Pelosi claimed. "They've had a good thing going for a long time at the expense of the American people and the health of our country," she said, adding that it will be tough to keep them from getting their way. "This is the fight of our lives."
- Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House
Posted by David Guilbault on July 30, 2009 at 02:13 PM in On Government, On Health, On Politics, On Truth | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The chief disinformation operative of the Republican party is leading a propaganda campaign against national health care reform. He is Frank Luntz.
He has crafted a 28-page talking points memo for Conservatives, called "The Language of Health Care 2009," to trumpet the dishonest accusation of a "Washington takeover of healthcare." It is cynical, distorted, fear mongering self-interest at its worst.
Luntz advises opponents of universal health care to make the debate about "politicians," "bureaucrats," and "Washington," and to highlight "horror stories" about "government takeover." He tells them to play on the fear the public has of "denied treatment."
Luntz writes, "The best approach is to empathize with the fear, anxiety and financial pain people are clearly feeling right now. So instead of dismissing their concerns, acknowledge them – up front – and then pivot to your solution. Some conservatives will undoubtedly find this distasteful. But failure to connect on a personal level at the beginning will lead to communication failure at the end."
Later he writes, "It is essential that “deny” and “denial” enter the conservative lexicon immediately because it is at the core of what scares Americans most about a government takeover of healthcare. Then add to it the source of that denial and you have the perfect anti-government, anti-Washington and anti-Democratic message."
So, you will hear this mantra repeated from Republican after Republican:
“No Washington bureaucrat or healthcare lobbyist should stand between your family and your doctor. The Democrats want to put Washington politicians in charge of YOUR healthcare. We can and must do better. Say no to a Washington takeover of healthcare and say yes to personalized patient-centered care.”
Of course, "personalized patient-centered care" is code for health insurance company control. That is the powerful industry Luntz and his cohorts are trying to protect.
Luntz and his associates are the premier manipulators of language for selfish, partisan ends.
Read one of his mission statements from their web site (emphasis is mine):
Luntz, Maslansky Strategic Research
"Our focus is on language. We believe that every word you use matters. Luntz, Maslansky is known across the nation for how we reframe issues. From changing the “estate tax” to the “death tax,” “tax cuts” to “tax relief,” “global warming” to “climate change” – time after time we have succeeded in changing the course of the debate. By focusing on how to communicate your message, Luntz, Maslansky helps you reframe the issue using your side’s words and messages. Our unique research methodology allows us to precisely gauge public opinion and develop the most effective approach and language to take control of the issue. We know how to change hearts and minds and motivate people to act."
from Luntz, Maslansky Strategic Research website

Their goal is to help "virtually every major industry" to distort their message and mask their true agenda. Another quote from their web site:
"In the political arena, our CEO, Dr. Frank Luntz, is known for helping change the public vocabulary – he transformed the "estate tax" into the "the death tax," moved the public debate from "school vouchers" to "opportunity scholarships," and re-cast "drilling for oil" as "exploring for energy." ... In the corporate arena, Luntz, Maslansky currently works for clients in virtually every major industry: pharmaceuticals, telecommunications, energy, health care, transportation, sports, entertainment, travel and tourism, shopping centers, grocery stores, restaurants, food, and beverages."
If Frank Luntz is involved in a public campaign, you may assume the goal is to "pull the wool over your eyes."
And, so then, is his mission in the health care debate.
Photo Credit: Frederick M. Brown / Getty Images
Posted by David Guilbault on June 11, 2009 at 07:15 PM in On Government, On Greed, On Health, On Politics, On Truth | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Dateline: MEXICO CITY
THE VIRUS IS WINNING
In the battle against the Human Immunodeficiency Virus, the virus is winning.
33 million people are living with HIV infection according to 2007 figures from UNAIDS. This increase is a result of new infections and the beneficial effects of more widely available antiretroviral (ARV) therapy.
Three million people are now on ARV drugs. But, for ever person who starts treatment, two or three more are newly infected.
The call here, at the XXVII International AIDS Conference, is for universal and free access to HIV/AIDS treatment by 2010.
Offical Conference Press Releases
CLINICAL TRIALS FAILING
At the last conference of the International AIDS Society, the host of this event, in Toronto, there was great talk and hope for the development of vaccines or microbicides to fight the epidemic. But, nascent clinical trials for both have come up short. Still, those here insist that we learn something from each failed trial, and that we must continue to devote substantial funds to find a cure.
FUNCTIONAL CURE
However, Tony Fauci, a leader on global AIDS issues, says we may have to accept a ‘functional cure’ where early aggressive drug therapy allows people infected with HIV to live long, relatively healthy lives. HIV is becoming a widespread, treatable, chronic disease.
COMBINATION STRATEGIES
The talk here is to combine all known prevention and treatment strategies in a coordinated effort to treat existing infections and prevent future ones. Dr. Kevin De Cock, the Director of the World Health Organization, says we have to make that link strong and indivisible. Best to use whatever works for short-term gains while searching for a long-term solution.
TREAT EVERY INFECTED PERSON
And a dialogue is beginning on starting drug therapy sooner in patients, before their T-cell counts fall below 200, the current benchmark on when to begin therapy.
One idea presented here is creating quite a stir. A Canadian study suggests that since HIV patients whose viral loads are undetectable are believed to be less infectious, why not treat EVERY infected person, with the goal of eliminating their viral loads and thus preventing future transmissions? Dr. Julio Montano, of the Canadian group and the President-Elect of the International AIDS Society, says, ‘Basically, the more people you treat and the faster you engage people in treatment, the greater impact you will have on the epidemic.’
LYING IN WAIT
But, the virus may be too smart for even that approach. It knows how to lie in wait.
According to Dr. Robert Siliciano of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, when a person is first infected with the virus, the virus establishes itself in a stable reservoir, from which it begins replicating itself. When drug therapies start on that patient, the treatment attacks the replicated viruses. Viral load can drop to undetectable levels. But, there is still the original virus hiding in the reservoir, undetected. If the patient were to stop or slow therapy, those latent viruses would start replicating again and return the patient to his/her original level of infection.
PRE-EXPOSURE STUDIES
As early as next year we’ll see the results from trials of antiretroviral drugs being tested for HIV prevention, known as PrEP, or pre-exposure prophylaxis. Underway in Africa, Asia, Latin American and North America, PrEP is an unproven strategy in which HIV negative people could take an ARV, or combination of ARVs, on a regular basis in the hopes of reducing their risk of acquiring HIV.
HERE, THERE, EVERYWHERE
The goal of all viruses is to adapt and multiply. And HIV is a master at that.
Peter Poit, the Executive Director of UNAIDS, warned that the virus is always a step or two ahead of us. As we come to grips with the spread of the virus in one group or one geography, it finds another group in another location – married women in one locale, men who have sex with men in another, intravenous drug users somewhere else.
He also was less optimistic about a cure and said our goal is to keep anyone from dying of AIDS and to give those living with HIV a good life. To that end, he called for changing the funding model from an insurance scheme to a pension scheme. He said instead of protecting against unknown events, we should accept the fact that we need to plan for known events, i.e., that millions of people are and will be infected with HIV and are entitled to a full and healthy life.
AIDING HEALTH SYSTEMS
All across the world countries have to deal with this epidemic. Yet, in so-called resource poor nations, that is an overwhelming struggle. They are simply not medically equipped enough to meet the challenge. Speakers here noted that improving AIDS programs around the world will help build and strengthen all health systems. This disease may become a coalescing factor to bring coordinated, universal health care to millions around the globe.
RICHER, POORER
But, mocking the call for free drugs for everyone by 2010, the rich still fare better with this disease than the poor. Dr. Anton Pozniak of Advances in ART pointed out, antiretroviral therapy only works if you have access to it and you stay on it. As he and others said, access to newer therapies by poor people and countries is still a major problem.
SOCIAL CHANGE
And, of course, there are substantial governmental, cultural and organizational barriers to a successful battle against this disease.
Speaker after speaker here decried the fact that in too many countries there are harsh laws against homosexuality and increasing calls for the criminalization of people living with HIV/AIDS. In too many places, violence against those with HIV is rampant and, sometimes, sanctioned.
Dr. Jorge Saavedra Lopez, the head of the National HIV/AIDS Programme in Mexico reported that, all across the world, the existence and infection rate of men having sex with men is under reported because those MSM are living in the shadows.
For almost every group stigmatized by this epidemic – MSM, intravenous drug users, sex workers, trans-genders, and women in general – there was a loud and consistent call for basic human rights and protections.
SURVIVING EACH OTHER
A successful virus wants to live and thrive in its host. It does not want to kill it. More and more humans are now living with HIV. That’s good for us. But, it’s also good for the virus. We're now surviving each other.

Posted by David Guilbault on August 07, 2008 at 07:23 PM in On Health | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Dateline: MEXICO CITY
The theme that struck me today at the plenary session of the International AIDS Conference in Mexico City was 'in with the new'.
Dr. Tadataka Yamada of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation addressed the assembly on vaccines and microbicides. He noted that clinical trials to find safe and effective ones have been so-far unsuccessful. But, he, and others who spoke, were encouraged by the fact that each trial teaches us a little more about how to go forward.
His headline, to me, though, was that the foundation he represents is looking to challenge scientific dogma. They are soliciting novel ideas on how to fight HIV/AIDS. And they are willing to give seed funding to hundreds of such new efforts. They are willing to finance non-traditional innovation. More than that, he said, they would provide 'enormous' funds to those that proved promising.
Dr. Yamada lamented that making new medicines is a chancy endeavor, since nine out of ten medicines fail their trials. He said we were only in the very early stages of clinical trials for vaccines and microbicides to fight HIV and that the later stages would be very costly. He called on the funding community to continue giving big investments.

Dr. Alan Bernstein of the Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise followed that call with an appeal for new minds with new ideas to join the hunt for a cure and a new prevention strategy. He said it was time to give funding to our best young scientific investigators, calling them engines of discovery.
One young woman, Elisabet Fadul, at a session on the state of the epidemic, was a champion for including youth in the fight. She talked about how, increasingly, the new face of HIV is young, female and marginalized. Her call was for evidence-based sexual and health education. She warned the assembly that they must involve young people when those curricula are designed.
The other 'new' topic I heard as I moved from session to session was advocacy for the passage of anti-homophobia laws. The host country, Mexico, is leading the way on that issue.
And lastly, in the 'new' theme for today, Phill Wilson of the Black AIDS Institute led a call from community leaders 'for the creation and implementation of a new National AIDS Strategy to bring the same type of commitment to the domestic epidemic that the U.S. shows against the disease overseas'. That comes as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention acknowledged this week that the AIDS epidemic in the United States is 40% larger than previously known.
Posted by David Guilbault on August 04, 2008 at 06:58 PM in On Health | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Dateline: MEXICO CITY
Universal action now. That's the theme of the XXVII International AIDS Conference in Mexico City. I'm watching the opening session and it's frustrating viewing. I’ve heard all of this before. Speaker after speaker, each also having heard all this before, is repeating the mantra - action now. Fighting this epidemic is a never-ending now.
The title of Dr. Peter Piot's keynote address is 'Don't Give Up the Fight!". He's the Executive Director of UNAIDS and knows full well how difficult fighting this epidemic has become, 'Because the end of AIDS is nowhere in sight. Every day, almost three times as many people become infected with HIV as those who start antiretroviral treatment. We will set ourselves up for demoralization and failure if we base our strategies on the illusion that the end of AIDS can be achieved any time soon.'
'In most countries, stigma against people living with HIV remains a grave challenge. On third of countries still do not have laws to protect people living with HIV. In most countries, discrimination remains legal against women, men who have sex with men, sex workers, drug users, and ethnic minorities. This must change.' - Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations
'This means challenging head-on the stigma and discrimination that continue to hamper our progress against this disease. In this region, men who have sex with men continue to bear the brunt of the epidemic, that means challenging homophobia everywhere in our society: in government circles, in health care settings, in our families, and yes, in our churches as well.' - Dr. Louis-Soto Ramirez, AIDS 2008 Co-Chair
'Combination prevention, just like combination treatment, is the only feasible option. Anything else is, frankly, irresponsible. Combination prevention means finding the right mix of activities for each local epidemic. Combination prevention also invloves mobilizing for social change - no more stigma around HIV, no more homophobia, no more gender based violence, no more ostracism of sex workers." - Dr. Peter Piot, Executive Director, UNAIDS
'It is time to challenge the tyranny of ignorance and denial. It is time for leaders of all kinds - political, religious, and community - to help move these groups in from the margins of society to the center of the global response to HIV.' - Dr. Pedro Cahn, President, International AIDS Society
Of course, we can't win the battle against HIV without also defeating homophobia, denial, stigma, gender violence, discrimination, economic inequity, racism, intolerance, drug profiteering, scientific dogma, secrecy, ignorance, inequality, poverty, marginalization, insensitivity, infidelity, sexism, promiscuity, shame, fear, guilt, bias, blame, exclusion and religious doctrine. And so, the never-ending now.
Posted by David Guilbault on August 03, 2008 at 11:05 AM in On Health | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Missive Eleven
To Fellow Citizens of the World
We know how to help prevent HIV infections. Those having sex should always use a condom, drug users should shoot with clean needles, couples should be faithful and everyone should know and disclose their HIV status. It's that simple. And yet, the AIDS epidemic continues to grow at an unconscionable rate. Why?
Because prevention is all mixed up with morality. There are mistaken beliefs, contradicted by scientific study, that giving out condoms or clean needles encourages sexual promiscuity and drug abuse.
Too often, around the world, and in the United States particularly, you hear arguments against institutional action on prevention because interventions target those considered to be practicing 'sinful behaviors' - the promiscuous, homosexuals, adulterers, prostitutes, criminals, drug abusers.
We think that if 'those people' would just change their behaviors, all would be well. Well, those behaviors are never going to change. So, instead of recognizing the facts of life, and doing whatever we can to protect anyone and everyone at risk of getting infected, regardless of our personal opinions about their lifestyles, we condemn 'those people' to death by our inaction.
We counsel abstinence to teenagers we know will have unprotected sex. We demand fidelity of men and woman we know can and will be unfaithful. We withhold condoms and clean needles from inmates, while knowing that sexual intercourse and drug use are rampant in prison. We preach that homosexuality is a sin from our pulpits, knowing many in the congregations are gay and forced to live secret lives. And we turn a blind eye to sex workers around the world, willfully ignoring the fact that they mostly do what they do to survive.
We stigmatize those that need our help the most, out of misplaced moral arrogance. We punish those we label as sinners instead of saving them.
When churches won't give out condoms, when prisons won't give out clean needles, when schools won't teach safe sex, when communities won't accept their gay members, people get infected and die.
That, to me, is sinful behavior.

I will be reporting from the Seventeenth International AIDS Conference in Mexico City, the first week of August. It is my second convention, the first being last year in Toronto.
What struck me last year was that the prevention conversation had moved away from the moral issues I noted above to discussions about programs and procedures to help women protect themselves from the disease. There was a lot of talk about condom negotiation, the economic and social empowerment of women and the development of germicides.
But, the undertow pulling against progress is always secrecy and stigma.
Like it or not, we have to embrace those at risk, our so-called sinful brothers and sisters. We all have to attack this plague without undue moral judgment. It is the right thing to do. And the only way we can truly bring this epidemic under control.
Posted by David Guilbault on August 02, 2008 at 03:15 PM in On Health | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)



