Today, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano gave an honest assessment of the current threat of terrorism in a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations. It is worth a read.
"Homeland Security Secretary Janet A. Napolitano on Wednesday called for closer collaboration with foreign partners, more intensive cooperation with local law-enforcement officials, and greater involvement by citizens in watching for and responding to terrorist threats.
For too long, we’ve treated the public as a liability to be protected rather than as an asset in our nation’s collective security,” Ms. Napolitano said during a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. “This approach, unfortunately, has allowed confusion, anxiety and fear to linger.”
“The consequences of living in a state of fear rather than a state of preparedness are enormous,” she said. ...
“The terror threat is even more decentralized, networked and adaptive than on 9/11,” she said. “The United States needed an approach that was “more layered, networked and resilient.”
In her speech, Ms. Napolitano seemed intent on a shift of tone, a recasting of the way Americans view the terror threat. Implicitly, she seemed to rebuke the approach taken by the Bush administration, which critics said too often seemed to exaggerate threats and sow a sense of fear.
Today is the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall riots in 1969, which gave birth to the Gay Rights Movement. In 1994, I produced a report on the 25th anniversary for "The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour." It would be the only time in my career when I would experience censorship.
Manhattan was filled with homosexuals remembering and celebrating an historic moment. They put on a Gay Olympics, concerts and rallies around New York City and a celebration of love in Central Park.
I was working for Time Inc. New Media, which had a contract with the NewsHour to produce reports for the program. The video report I submitted looked at all the events of the weekend and was a comprehensive story on the state of gay rights in America at that time.
In one scene a winning athlete got a congratulatory kiss from his partner. Another sequence showed gay couples in the park doing what loving couples do all around the world - hugging, holding hands, resting their heads on their loved one's shoulder, brushing back their hair and kissing. It was a montage of expressions of affection.
The Executive Producer of the NewHour called me to his office across town to tell me to remove the kissing scenes, as they might offend the sensibilities of the older PBS news audience. I explained that both scenes were "normal" and central to the narrative. He disagreed. So, I compromised and said I would remove the congratulatory kiss, as not being completely germane to the athletic event, but that I would leave in the tender kiss at the love rally, as being completely appropriate. He agreed.
So, I re-cut and resubmitted the finished video report to the NewsHour.
But, when it aired, the NewsHour editors had, without my knowledge or consent, removed the kissing scene in the park. That meant that they had to extend the video to cover the narration that was under that part of the report. So, they slow-motioned all the park scenes to fill the gap in the video. What the audience saw was slowed-down video of all the tender moments, which made them look unnatural and unseemly, like they slow-mo criminals in their orange prison suits for the "perp walk."
Needless to say, I was outraged. I worked as a news producer for 20 years at ABC News and was one of the founding Senior Producers of Cable News Network. No one at either of those news organizations ever asked me to edit my report to satisfy the sensibilities of their audience. I found it disturbing that the so-called liberal powers-that-be at the NewsHour at the time would censor their own reports to satisfy the perceived prejudices of their audience.
To this day, it still bothers me.
Anyway, Frank Rich has a fine op-ed piece in today's New York Times remembering an event that most straight people never heard of to begin with. It's long past time to embrace human rights for all, all over the world. A kiss to everyone from me. Let your freak flags fly.
As the volatile situation in Iran develops, we should all be wary of reports circulating around the Internet, on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. Nevertheless, we should also be grateful that there are means to get the word out on what is happening in that press-restricted country. But beware imposters spreading false information.
The New York Times, in its news blog, The Lede, is doing the best it can to filter through a multitude of sources to try and piece together what is actually happening. It's worth monitoring.
LAS VEGAS — A jury here Friday night found O. J. Simpson
guilty on all counts in his robbery and kidnapping trial, a verdict
that came 13 years to the day after Mr. Simpson was acquitted in the
highly publicized murders of his ex-wife and her friend.
Gun ownership advocates keep talking about having guns in the home to defend against intruders. The sad truth is that most home gun owners turn the weapons on their family members or themselves.
'The Supreme Court's landmark ruling on gun ownership last week focused on citizens' ability to defend themselves from intruders in their homes. But research shows that surprisingly often, gun owners use the weapons on themselves. Suicides accounted for 55 percent of the nation's nearly 31,000 firearm deaths in 2005, the most recent year for which statistics are available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.'